Judicial Council

Who We Are

The Judicial Council (JC) represents the Judicial Branch, which is the third branch of the student government at Oregon State University. The primary duty of the Judicial Council is to interpret the Associated Students of Oregon State University Constitution and Statutes. The Council also advises over any group or organization of ASOSU. Any student organizations that hold a dispute within ASOSU either internally or between two parties can therefore hold a request from the Judicial Council to review the matter at hand. The Judicial Council therefore holds the power to issue an advisory, injunction, or binding decision in the form of an Opinion as to the inquiry requested.

 

Attention

The Judicial Council has transitioned its official business to Microsoft Teams. In the interest of transparency, all JC business will be done on the JC Teams. It is public for all members of ASOSU! 

 

Instructions:

On Microsoft Teams, navigate to the Teams tab, and click "Join or create team." Input the team code below to join. To be notified of all JC meetings, turn on the "Meetings" channel notifications.

q4uz340

Our Structure

The Judicial Council is comprised of 7 voting members, each appointed for four years by the ASOSU President and confirmed by the Senate. Internally, the JC elects a JC Chair to help facilitate meetings and guide the rest of members. Writs of Inquiries are brought before the JC pertaining to ASOSU guiding documents, and the JC exercises thorough and timely deliberation on the matter before issuing a Judicial Council Opinion. The opinions of the JC are absolute, insofar as an appeal isn't filed that could bring forth new information or challenge the ruling. 

View Judicial Council Policies

Writ of Inquiry

Please use the form below to submit a Writ of Inquiry!

Writ of Inquiry Form

Meet your Judicial Council

See the people who are apart of ASOSU's Judicial Council!

Meet your JC

Opinions

The JC releases Opinions within fifteen days of the Council beginning closed deliberations of the case.

View JC Opinions